Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Pandemic Preparedness: Why the Humanities and Social Sciences Matter A recently published article in Frontiers in Public Health outlines the importance of insights from the humanities and social sciences for developing and maintaining preparedness for future pandemics. Here, Sally Frampton explains how this interdisciplinary and collaborative research publication came about.

pandemic preparedness why the humanities and social sciences matter in white color on top of blue background

Our Frontiers article has its roots in workshop that took place in December 2022 at the University of Oxford as part of Infecting Minds: The Past, Present and Future of Vaccine Hesitancy in South Africa, which was a John Fell Fund/Wellcome ISSF funded project with additional funding from the Crick Institute in London. The purpose of the workshop was to see how the concept of vaccine hesitancy might be problematised or re-shaped through multidisciplinary discussion. The workshop brought together voices from history, theology, social sciences, clinical medicine, art, and science communication. Vaccine hesitancy was listed as one of the World Health Organisation’s top ten threats to global health in 2019 and vaccine hesitancy is fundamental to several domains, including stopping infectious diseases and preparing for epidemics. While pandemic preparedness often focuses on epidemiological, clinical, laboratory and public health approaches and resources, we wanted to set out an urgent case of need to improve confidence in vaccine programmes through interdisciplinary activity, integrating social science, history, theology, ethics, policy, and public engagement. Exploring the roots of vaccine hesitancy over time in communities occupying different geographical and cultural spaces provides opportunities to understand why vaccines are accepted or rejected within certain locales and networks. Approaches must account for political and policy influences, and the role of conflict and crisis. Special attention is needed to understand narratives within certain specific settings, for example, faith communities, healthcare workers, and vulnerable populations including those under-served by conventional models of healthcare.

 

Read the full article on TORCH website.