Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BACKGROUND: The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) and the Child and Adolescent Behaviour Inventory (CABI) are freely accessible tools used to assess depression and externalizing symptoms, respectively. There is limited psychometric evidence on how these scales hold over time and across cultures. This study aims to evaluate the internal structure of both scales and their invariance across six countries and over two timepoints. METHODS: Data from the ParentChat Pilot Study included information from 566 adults (85.51 % female) with children aged 2 to 17. Only female data from North Macedonia, Malaysia, Moldova, Montenegro, Philippines, and South Africa were used. Confirmatory factor analysis was employed to assess invariance of each construct. RESULTS: At baseline, the DASS depression subscale achieved scalar invariance across five countries (CFI = 0.973, TLI = 0.956, RMSEA = 0.060, SRMR = 0.069) and across timepoints (CFI = 0.990, TLI = 0.979, RMSE = 0.037, SRMR = 0.034). The CABI extract achieved scalar invariance across two countries (CFI = 0.968, TLI = 0.963, RMSEA = 0.068, SRMR = 0.085) and across timepoints (CFI = 0.983, TLI = 0.980, RMSEA = 0.044, SRMR = 0.067). LIMITATIONS: Small sample sizes, disproportionate female sample, and use of subscales or item extracts may limit generalizability. The scales were also not validated for all age groups used. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides evidence of validity for the internal structure of the DASS and CABI extracts across cultures and over time. These findings support the use of these open-access tools in resource-limited settings to promote local research.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.jad.2025.119524

Type

Journal article

Journal

J Affect Disord

Publication Date

27/05/2025

Volume

387

Keywords

CABI, Cross-cultural comparisons, DASS, Depression, Externalizing behaviour, Psychometrics