Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Every year thousands of young people exhibit designs for genetically modified organisms at the International Genetically Engineered Machine (iGEM) competition in Boston. Regarding living creatures as “machines” is nothing new. Even still, life is being remade in novel and surprising ways as iGEM students use increasingly fast and cheap genetic engineering tools. Designs for living machines that seek to optimize biology are ironically generating new kinds of wildness where a loss of control presents unknown risks and new dangers. Human health and the well-being of other species is at stake. Following students from iGEM to their home universities—in Sydney, London, and Abu Dhabi—I studied the interplay of utopian dreams and nightmare scenarios. Some iGEM participants hope to alter the human condition with new kinds of symbiotic bacteria. Other competitors seek to repair fragile multispecies worlds where endangered species and structurally marginalized people are in precarious situations. Power is functioning predictably at iGEM. FBI agents are promoting government and corporate interests as they police narrowly defined risks. Gatekeepers to capital are translating the entrepreneurial potential of student projects into profit. The imagination has become a battlefield as students with alternative priorities, values, interests, and ethical commitments struggle to find support.

Original publication

DOI

10.1086/715011

Type

Journal article

Journal

Current Anthropology

Publication Date

01/08/2021

Volume

62

Pages

S287 - S297