Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

AIM: Local excision (LE) for T1 rectal cancer may be recommended in those with low-risk disease, while resection is typically recommended in those with a high risk of luminal recurrence or lymph node metastasis. The aim of this work was to compare survival between resection and LE. METHOD: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study set in the Canadian province of Ontario. Patients were individuals with T1Nx rectal cancer between 2010 and 2014 and demographics, disease characteristics, treatments and outcomes were determined using linked administrative databases. This study does not include clinical information regarding individual patient treatment decisions. The main outcome measure was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 719 patients were identified, including 359 with upfront resection, 113 with LE and immediate resection (<90 days) and 247 with LE with definitive intent. The majority of LEs were performed via colonoscopy. Piecemeal excision (42% vs. 49%, p = 0.28) and positive margin (50% vs. 77%, p 

Original publication

DOI

10.1111/codi.17276

Type

Journal article

Journal

Colorectal Dis

Publication Date

01/2025

Volume

27

Keywords

T1, local excision, rectal cancer, Humans, Rectal Neoplasms, Male, Female, Retrospective Studies, Aged, Middle Aged, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Ontario, Neoplasm Staging, Proctectomy, Treatment Outcome, Margins of Excision, Lymphatic Metastasis, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Aged, 80 and over, Colonoscopy