Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Over the past decade, the interest in oxygen toxicity has led to various observational studies and randomized clinical trials in critically ill patients, assessing the association with outcomes and the potential benefit of restrictive oxygenation targets. Yet to date, no consensus has been reached regarding the clinical impact of hyperoxia and hyperoxemia. In this perspective article, we explore the experimental and clinical evidence on hyperoxia-induced lung injury (HILI) and assess its relative impact in current critical care practice, specifically in patients who require oxygen therapy due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Here, we suggest that in current clinical practice in the setting of ARDS HILI may actually be of less importance than other ventilator-related factors.

Original publication

DOI

10.1152/ajplung.00443.2022

Type

Journal article

Journal

Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol

Publication Date

01/07/2023

Volume

325

Pages

L9 - L16

Keywords

acute lung injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, mechanical ventilation, oxygen therapy, ventilator-induced lung injury, Humans, Lung Injury, Hyperoxia, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Oxygen, Respiration, Artificial