Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are facing an urgent and complex challenge: how to transition to greater self-sustainability in health financing amid declining donor support. While this shift is inevitable, the policy responses it elicits carry significant implications for health system equity and access.

Avoidable pitfalls on the path to health financing self-reliance in LMICs © Ruth Wanjala, KEMRI Wellcome Trust, Kenya

BMJ Global Health commentary by Edwine Barasa, Jane Chuma, Justice Nonvignon and Olusoji O Adeyi.

LMICs are confronting a new fiscal reality in the wake of declining external assistance for health. Recent reductions in donor funding have created what has been referred to as funding cliffs. These sudden and significant drops in aid threaten the delivery of critical health services, risking the reversal of decades of progress in the fight against HIV, tuberculosis, malaria and in reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health.

In a BMJ Global Health commentary, the authors highlight four policy choices increasingly observed in LMICs that they argue are unacceptable in the pursuit of sustainability. These include: (1) shifting the financial burden to out-of-pocket payments; (2) over-reliance on contributory health insurance schemes; (3) displacement of basic primary healthcare services; and (4) abandoning community-based service delivery in favour of facility-centric models, undermining the integrity of people-centred health systems.

The authors argue that while short-term fiscal pressures may push countries towards these decisions, they ultimately erode health gains, exacerbate inequities and threaten progress towards universal health coverage. They call on policymakers to adopt evidence-informed approaches that enhance efficiency, protect the most vulnerable, prioritise public financing and preserve the core values of inclusive and equitable health systems during this critical transition.

Read the full commentary in BMJ Global Health

Similar stories

New Nature Health commentary calls for solidarity in a more transactional global health era

As geopolitical interests drive a more transactional global health era, a new Nature Health commentary argues for solidarity to guide how resources are shared, decisions are made and health equity is advanced.

Building sustainable breastfeeding support systems beyond hospital care

Research led by Dr Martha Mwangome at the KEMRI-Wellcome Research Programme is strengthening breastfeeding support for malnourished infants after hospital discharge, extending care into communities with the aim of improving exclusive breastfeeding, infant growth, neurodevelopment and recovery.

Behind the Title - Becoming an Oxford Professor: Featuring Professor Sassy Molyneux

Professor Sassy Molyneux reflects on her unconventional path to becoming an Oxford Professor of Global Health, shaped by 26 years living and working in Kenya and an interdisciplinary career spanning health systems, social science and research ethics.

Unlocking the full potential of community health workers for Africa’s adolescents

New study identifies opportunities to strengthen adolescent health and well-being in Africa.

Smoking and drinking exacerbate social inequalities in premature deaths in India

Study finds social inequality is a major predictor of premature death, even among people who neither smoke nor drink alcohol.

Drought linked to 46% increase in sexual violence among adolescents in Southern Africa

Study reveals climate change is increasing risks to child safety.